Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider renaming destroy to terminate, or at least alias it #14

Closed
evanworley opened this issue Aug 2, 2013 · 3 comments
Closed

Consider renaming destroy to terminate, or at least alias it #14

evanworley opened this issue Aug 2, 2013 · 3 comments

Comments

@evanworley
Copy link

This might make traditional web worker migration to operative a little more seamless. This just hit me, where my old code which had been ported to operative was still calling terminate.
@padolsey
Copy link
Owner

padolsey commented Aug 4, 2013

Good idea. This'll go into the next release.

@padolsey
Copy link
Owner

padolsey commented Aug 4, 2013

I think alias would be best, to retain backwards-compat. Possibly deprecate 'destroy'.

@padolsey
Copy link
Owner

Decided to go ahead and add this all by its lonesome to 0.3.0 5325ed2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@padolsey @evanworley