Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Breaking changes coming to Bamboo v2.0.0 #36

Closed
germsvel opened this issue Feb 18, 2021 · 6 comments · Fixed by #37
Closed

Breaking changes coming to Bamboo v2.0.0 #36

germsvel opened this issue Feb 18, 2021 · 6 comments · Fixed by #37

Comments

@germsvel
Copy link

👋 Hi Pablo,

Thanks for maintaining this Bamboo adapter. 🥳

There will be a breaking change coming to Bamboo in v2.0.0 where the deliver_now function will no longer raise an error on failure to deliver an email. Instead, it will return :ok or :error tuples. That way, users of the library can decide how to handle the errors. I've completed that work in beam-community/bamboo#571.

I've also added a deliver_now! function that is meant to behave exactly as deliver_now currently behaves. So, there's an easy upgrade path for users who don't want to handle their own errors. They can change deliver_now -> deliver_now!.

(There are also deliver_later corresponding changes, but from the adapter's perspective, I don't know that it matters).

What that means for adapters

In order for people to upgrade to Bamboo v2.0.0, the adapters will need to stop raising errors when they fail to deliver emails. In order to accommodate that, the adapter's callbacks are changing like this:

- @callback deliver(%Bamboo.Email{}, %{}) :: any
+ @callback deliver(%Bamboo.Email{}, %{}) :: {:ok, any} | {:error, Exception.t() | String.t()}

In other words, adapters should now return an {:ok, response} tuple or an {:error, error} tuple, where the error is either an exception struct that can later be raised or an error message.

To facilitate that work, PR 571 also introduces a Bamboo.ApiError.build_api_error function that can be used by adapters — if you want to easily build an error to return in the {:error, error} response.

Sample changes to other adapters

I have already done some changes to the Sendgrid, Mailgun, and Mandrill adapters. They might serve as a guide:

Why open this issue?

I wanted to open this issue for two reasons:

  1. To let you know about the changes that are coming up (all of the above), and
  2. To ask you if there's anything I can do to help with the transition.

Unfortunately, I can't offer to open PRs to make the changes in all the adapter repos, but if it's helpful, I'd be happy to review PRs.

And if there's some change to Bamboo that would make it easier to work with your adapter, or if you have suggestions or comments on PR 571, I'd love to know.

Thanks again for maintaining this adapter, and please feel free to close this issue whenever you've read it (if it's of no further use). It just seemed like the easiest way to communicate about the upcoming changes with you.

@mdlkxzmcp
Copy link
Contributor

@pablo-co the aforementioned 2.0 has already gone live. If you want, I'd be willing to try to make a PR for this as there is not a lot of things that need to be done :)

@pablo-co
Copy link
Owner

@mdlkxzmcp if you can open that PR I'm happy to merge and publish. 😄

@samhamilton
Copy link

@pablo-co would you mind cutting a new release on hex so its possible to upgrade to Bamboo 2.0?

@pablo-co
Copy link
Owner

pablo-co commented Apr 5, 2021

@samhamilton was waiting for another possible breaking change regarding TLS certificates to release as V1.0.0. Though it appears that PR won't be necessary, so will cut a release with just this PR 👍

@edds
Copy link

edds commented Apr 22, 2021

@pablo-co hey, did a release get cut that includes this? Would be super useful for us so we can interrogate error messages.

@pablo-co
Copy link
Owner

Sorry for the delay @edds. Just released v1.0.0 with these changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants