Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow configuring default file view #11962

Open
dwhite5914 opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Allow configuring default file view #11962

dwhite5914 opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@dwhite5914
Copy link

dwhite5914 commented Nov 25, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

In our lab, we use this product as a file share solution, making heavy use of the "Spaces" tab. In this setup, we find the "List View" to be the most useful option for viewing files of the available options: "List", "Compact List", "Tiles". I wish there was some way to configure this as the default view, which currently defaults to "Tiles" with no option to change it unless set manually by the user.

Describe the solution you'd like

As an admin, I would like to be able to configure the default file view option from the available options: "List", "Compact List", or "Tiles". This could be achieved via configuration file or environment variable. For instance, in docker compose: OCIS_DEFAULT_FILE_VIEW: "List".

Describe alternatives you've considered

N/A

Additional context

This should apply generally, but I am using a three container podman setup with OCIS server, OCIS Collaboration Server, and OnlyOffice Document Server.

@micbar
Copy link
Contributor

micbar commented Nov 25, 2024

@kulmann @JammingBen @AlexAndBear Can you think about this proposal please?

@micbar micbar transferred this issue from owncloud/ocis Nov 25, 2024
@AlexAndBear
Copy link
Contributor

AlexAndBear commented Nov 25, 2024

@micbar
We do save this setting(s) in the local storage
image

So, it's a setting; we do persist. I am figuring out the actual use case for having it pre-configured when the user has the free choice.

But technically spoken, quite possible 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants