Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UX additions for external storage #12338

Closed
3 tasks done
PVince81 opened this issue Nov 20, 2014 · 6 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

UX additions for external storage #12338

PVince81 opened this issue Nov 20, 2014 · 6 comments

Comments

@PVince81
Copy link
Contributor

PVince81 commented Nov 20, 2014

@MTRichards @craigpg @karlitschek anything else ?

@icewind1991

@MTRichards
Copy link
Contributor

In addition to the config options for external storage, the list of config options might make sense to be here too. How is this different than #12216 ?

@MTRichards
Copy link
Contributor

I see, this is the UX parts. But lots of the config options are also UX related on setup.

Unavailable storage: we need a mechanism, such as the red bar in WND and SharePoint, that shows that the storage is unavailable. When the red bar is clicked on, a credential entry window pops up if it is a credential problem. A network connection warning pops up otherwise. Depending on the storage, we have different ability to detect the type of error, but if we can detect the type this is the desired behavior.

@PVince81
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MTRichards yes, the list of requirements is quite big and I'm trying to split everything in smaller manageable logical units.

The goal of the config options is more an admin thing, to make storages more configurable, not to bring a nice positive emotional experience to admins or users (UX). If an admin cannot configure encryption for a storage it is not bad UX but just a missing feature.

Unavailable storage in contrary is more UX matters because users want to know what is going on with their unavailable storages and be able to fix it quickly instead of jumping through hoops. Not knowing why the storage is unavaiable would be bad UX.

@PVince81
Copy link
Contributor Author

Implemented partly by @jmaciasportela here #20569 (comment)

@PVince81
Copy link
Contributor Author

PVince81 commented May 3, 2016

I think we're done here, closing.

@PVince81 PVince81 closed this as completed May 3, 2016
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Aug 4, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 4, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants