-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 668
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PropagateDirectory: Investigate if _subJobs should be pre-allocated (reserve()) or squeeze() #5454
Comments
@ogoffart I'd say we can squeeze() _subJobs in directories when we're done with them in |
I think that this is solved by #5400 as the whole PropagateDirectory job is now destroyed by its parent when it's finished. |
@jturcotte I mean the pre-running peak. If you squeeze() or reserve() it won't take so much space in memory BEFORE running. (directly after constructing). @jturcotte @ckamm Agree to reopen? See @ckamm 's comment above.. |
I interpret "when we're done with them" as "when the job if finished".
|
Ahh you guys mean to remove the extra capacity that append might reserve, yes that might help save a few KBytes. |
Exactly! |
You can only do this at the end of |
This has been resolved through #5451. During setup we only build a |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: