Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

possibility to omit warnings about symbolic links in activity log #2127

Open
atroxix opened this issue Aug 29, 2014 · 4 comments
Open

possibility to omit warnings about symbolic links in activity log #2127

atroxix opened this issue Aug 29, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@atroxix
Copy link

atroxix commented Aug 29, 2014

I've got quite a few symbolic links in my OwnCloud directories. I also tend to keep an eye on activity log and because there are so many, these warnings about symbolic links not being support are a little annoying.

Would it be possible to eg. add an option to select which loglevel to show under activity? These could be considered warnings, updates could be considered higher priority etc.
Maybe there's something else to be added for debugging that can be then easily turned on/off with the same option?

My environment:

OpenSUSE 13.1 everywhere
OwnCloud 7.0.2 on server
OwnCloud clients 1.6.2 and 1.7.0beta1

--- Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/4115155-possibility-to-omit-warnings-about-symbolic-links-in-activity-log?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F216457&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F216457&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).
@dragotin
Copy link
Contributor

@jancborchardt what would you suggest?

@jancborchardt
Copy link
Member

The first improvement we have to make for the Activity log is to keep the real errors (and currently in progress transfers) up top: #1745

This might take care of this already, if we put the symlink warning into a »notice« category, not a hard warning.

@atroxix
Copy link
Author

atroxix commented Aug 29, 2014

Seems reasonable. Can we also have a setting about which errorlevel to see?

@jancborchardt
Copy link
Member

Maybe after we do the basic improvements mentioned in #1745. We have to go step by step improving the current base before adding new stuff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants