Allow explicit rotation order for Progress props #564
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As the rotation order varies wildly across community scripts, and Rockstar usually uses order 2, allowing overrides here is important for compatibility when updating legacy resources. From a personal perspective, order 0 is kinda just a pain in the ass to use. The X and Z axes have to be manipulated in inverse to each other to produce meaningful rotation. There is also an inversion zone, which causes unexpected shifting at some points of X/Z crossover. Order 1, as well as some others, are much more friendly to work with.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As the rotation order varies wildly across community scripts, and Rockstar usually uses order 2, allowing overrides here is important for compatibility when updating legacy resources.
From a personal perspective, order 0 is kinda just a pain in the ass to use. The X and Z axes have to be manipulated in inverse to each other to produce meaningful rotation. There is also an inversion zone, which causes unexpected shifting at some points of X/Z crossover. Order 1, as well as some others, are much more friendly to work with.