You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a follow-up for the issue for specification of variable type for a custom function, trevorstephens#175
Have you figured out how to do that?
For example : I would like to add a pow(x,n)=x**n function such that the base is taken from array, but the second arity, power, is only accepted as integers.
The official version doesn't support it yet as we know, but do you have any idea that you succeeded to implement?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry to reply in the new year.
I have modified the package a little bit and offer a new API to accept function set whose last input could be an integer. But I do it in a way through pruning the _program.
I would like to check if there's any progress on this issue?my thinking is to break mutation steps into 2 parts, first to mutate every constant params, then to imply custom functions without constant params as normal.
Hello,
As a follow-up for the issue for specification of variable type for a custom function,
trevorstephens#175
Have you figured out how to do that?
For example : I would like to add a pow(x,n)=x**n function such that the base is taken from array, but the second arity, power, is only accepted as integers.
The official version doesn't support it yet as we know, but do you have any idea that you succeeded to implement?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: