Feature: Security benefit on having 2 or more Required Reviews no clear (Feedback)

[joycebrum]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Some maintainers had raised the question about whether it is really a relevant security best practice to have 2+ Required Review (related to the branch protection check)

Describe alternatives you've considered
The Branch-Protection check explanation could talk (or at least refer) an explanation on why it is important to have 2 or more required reviews

Additional context
electron/electron#35741 (review)

[laurentsimon]

To protect against insider risks: if one maintainer is compromised, an attacker can send a PR and use the compromised account to LGTM their own PRs. X LGTMs requires X compromised maintainers, which is harder.
You can also point them to slsa.dev: the source requirement will have more examples.

[joycebrum]

I've created a PR #3013 to address this issue and try to make this benefit clear to the user too. Thanks for the explanation @laurentsimon !