-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
overpass osm-fr usage limits #121
Comments
on the principle: yes of course, SC can use the osm-fr instance as a fallback |
Thanks for the answer! Hopefully SC will not consume too many resources.
Yes, PR adding osm-fr server to available ones would also add &contact parameter as requested at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Servers/overpass.openstreetmap.fr .
Yes - set for example at https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/blob/master/app/src/main/java/de/westnordost/streetcomplete/data/OsmModule.java#L71
in the application code
I have no idea |
BTW, is upgrading overpass version to new version planned in the near future? (if yes then I would be able to wait instead of checking compatibility of syntax of all quests) |
I know about
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Servers/overpass.openstreetmap.fr
Is it possible to get special permission for greater use in something directly improving OSM, like an OSM editor?
I am asking about StreetComplete ( https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete ).
Alternative Overpass servers will be used since the next version for bypassing censorship in Russia. Currently only server operated by Kumi Systems is available as an option, and it would be useful to have more than one alternative.
For that use it will be probably less than 1000/queries day anyway as it is useful only for people in Russia (and other countries with blocked main overpass instance), but I am not sure.
See streetcomplete/StreetComplete#1389 for more info.
For censorship status (caused by attempts to block Telegram in Russia) see https://isitblockedinrussia.com/?host=http%3A%2F%2Foverpass.openstreetmap.fr%2Fapi%2F (not blocked) and https://isitblockedinrussia.com/?host=https%3A%2F%2Foverpass-api.de%2Fapi%2F (blocked)
Would it be OK to give overpass.openstreetmap.fr as an additional option?
Second possible use of overpass osm-fr instance is for initial task scan, what is likely to be causing usage heavier than 1000 calls/day, especially in case of many new users appearing in short time - streetcomplete/StreetComplete#1457 (but this one is just proposal for feature).
Would it be OK to use overpass.openstreetmap.fr also in this case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: