bib: add a bunch of DOIs, minor corrections #4317
Conversation
DOIs added via script from <https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/300474>. The DOIs were then checked with <https://www.doi2bib.org> and in a few cases further adjustments were made to the bib data.
| number = {11}, | ||
| pages = {4491--4535}, | ||
| year = {2023}, | ||
| month = jun, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| month = jun, |
we usually don't keep track of months, and here it is formatted differently as all other fields
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we usually don't keep track of months, shouldn't bibtool be configured to delete the fields?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are months in the bibliography, but there is a wild mix of formatting already in there:
month = {Mar},
month = {1},
month = jun,
month = {mar},
Thus I would keep this PR as is and instead convert this to a new issue that deals with unifying the month fields or deciding to delete them (both using appropriate bibtool settings).
| volume = {409}, | ||
| pages = {108646}, | ||
| year = {2022}, | ||
| month = nov, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| month = nov, |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4317 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.49% 84.49% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 645 645
Lines 85589 85589
==========================================
- Hits 72321 72319 -2
- Misses 13268 13270 +2
|
DOIs added via script from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/300474. The DOIs were then checked with https://www.doi2bib.org and in a few cases further adjustments were made to the bib data.
Some progress towards #4214.