You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On on-boarding the TU Delft flood models and commercial models (code not yet in physrisk main) we have integrated flood standard of protection in the flood hazard indicators. This was probably a bad move for 3 reasons (!):
It is desirable to make standard of protection and unprotected flood depth arbitrarily combinable (easier to compare different flood models)
SoP applies to current conditions
Exactly how unprotected flood curves are changed by SoP should be a modelling choice and something that can be modified
This change (to hazard and physrisk) is to make SoP a hazard indicator in its own right. This splits the TU Delft sets into two and adds SoP into physrisk explicitly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On on-boarding the TU Delft flood models and commercial models (code not yet in physrisk main) we have integrated flood standard of protection in the flood hazard indicators. This was probably a bad move for 3 reasons (!):
This change (to
hazard
andphysrisk
) is to make SoP a hazard indicator in its own right. This splits the TU Delft sets into two and adds SoP into physrisk explicitly.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: