Postprocess : support list of range in index

[ValletRomain]

For indexation of Postprocessing of cfpdes.
It would be able to have an compact indexation to do this usage :

I want to compute :

"magnetic": {
            "Measures": {
                "Statistics": {
                    "MagneticEnergy": {
                        "type": "integrate",
                        "expr": "-2*pi*magnetic_phi/x*materials_sigma*(materials_U/2/pi):magnetic_phi:materials_sigma:materials_U:x",
                        "markers": "H%1_1%_Cu%1_2%"
                        }
                  }
            }
}

With "H%1_1%_Cu%1_2%" have next values :

H1_Cu1 H1_C2 H1_Cu3 H1_Cu4 H1_Cu5
H2_Cu1 H2_C2 H2_Cu3 H2_Cu4 H2_Cu5 H2_Cu6 H2_Cu7
H3_Cu1 H3_C2

[romainhild]

Can you try something like this:

"markers":"H%1_1%_Cu%1_2%",
"index1":[["1","%2%"],["2","%3%"],["3","%4%"]],
"index2":"1:6",
"index3":"1:8",
"index4":"1:3"

Maybe this would work

[romainhild]

Or even

"markers":"H%1_1%_Cu%1_2%",
"index1":[["1","1:6"],["2","1:8"],["3","1:3"]]

[ValletRomain]

Thanks, the first version works.

[ValletRomain]

I do a test with various versions :

Version0 : detail of indices

"heat": {
            "Measures": {
                "Statistics": {
                    "Intensity_H%1_1%_Cu%1_2%": {
                        "type": "integrate",
                        "expr": "-materials_sigma*materials_U/2/pi/x:materials_sigma:materials_U:x",
                        "markers": "H%1_1%_Cu%1_2%",
                        "index1": [
                            ["1","0"],["1","1"], ["1","2"],["1","3"], ["1","4"], ["1","5"],["1","6"],["1","7"],["1","8"],["1","9" ],["1","10"],
                            ["1","11" ],["1","12"],["1","13"],["1","14"],[ "1","15"],[ "1", "16"],["1","17"],["1","18"],["1","19"],["1","20"],
                            ["2","0"],["2","1"], ["2","2"],["2","3"], ["2","4"], ["2","5"],["2","6"],["2","7"],["2","8"],["2","9" ]
                        ]
                    }
                }
            }
        }

Version1 :

        "heat": {
            "Measures": {
                "Statistics": {
                    "Intensity_H%1_1%_Cu%1_2%": {
                        "type": "integrate",
                        "expr": "-materials_sigma*materials_U/2/pi/x:materials_sigma:materials_U:x",
                        "markers": "H%1_1%_Cu%1_2%",
                        "index1": [ ["1","%2%"], ["2", "%3%"] ],
                        "index2": "0:21",
                        "index3": "0:10"
                    }
                }
            }
        }

Version2 :

        "heat": {
            "Measures": {
                "Statistics": {
                    "Intensity_H%1_1%_Cu%1_2%": {
                        "type": "integrate",
                        "expr": "-materials_sigma*materials_U/2/pi/x:materials_sigma:materials_U:x",
                        "markers": "H%1_1%_Cu%1_2%",
                        "index1": [ ["1","0:21"], ["2", "0:10"] ]
                    }
                }
            }
        }

[ValletRomain]

The Version0 and Version1 give me a good result (the good intensities are export).

The Version2 doesn't succeed : the execution crashes and returns the error message :
Segmentation fault

For Version1, I observe an explosion of Execution time :

Execution times :

• Version0 : 17s
• Vernsion1 : 201s

I observe a difference of order 10. The Version1 is ineffective compared the Version0.