Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
To expand a bit on the above:
Any pointers would be very much appreciated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
🕒 Discussion Activity Reminder 🕒 This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1️⃣ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2️⃣ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context — or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3️⃣ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! 💬 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
reopen pls |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Select Topic Area
Question
Body
I'm using
sccache
with GHA to cache rust compilation artifacts.However even if the CI is able to hit all caches, the compilation still takes roughly the same time as without the cache.
It seems that accessing GHA cache is a bit slow, I wonder if this is because
sccache
stores each compilation result as a separate artifact on GHA cache, with some being only a few KB large.From mozilla/sccache#1756
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions