GitHub Community
Replies: 33 comments 4 replies
-
|
I'm interested in this issue. Has someone at Github seen this and has this idea been considered? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
#4174 related ideas |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Provide some references:
It's very useful! :D |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks, you are right, I can also add the following from Git-on-Borg (here this is the AOSP |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Any news? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
So, does anyone have an answer for this? Could somebody from the GitHub Support Team provide a response please? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This feature is a must. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Looking for the same here |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Response #1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is a much needed feature. Any official news about it? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
👍🏽 interested |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
+1 we would really appreciate this when moving from GitLab with a lot of repositories that were in groups |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
and others
-
GitLab offers a thing called subgroups in their organization-like system. It allows grouping project repositories without the need to create multiple organizations.
This feature is really useful when managing projects and should really be implemented.
This could for example avoid GitHub creating multiple organizations (
cli,actions...). Those project could directly be ingithub!Subgroups could also have some global features (like webhooks, public/private views...) so new repositories in the group inherit the group settings.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions