You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
Thanks to all persons contributing to the asyncapi project, it was a very usefull tool... untill 2.6.0 in my opinion.
I am using asyncapi to describe MQTT interfaces and recently i have converted thanks to the studio an API from 2.6.0 to 3.0.0.
Sorry, but writing SEND and RECEIVE doest not make any sense, the MQTT terms are PUBLISH and SUBSCRIBE !
I have seen a post about making generalisation for multi protocols butwill not read it: these developpement considerations cannot justify such a regression. Does Swagger use SEND and RECEIVE ?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
AsyncAPI Initiative
-
Hi,
Thanks to all persons contributing to the asyncapi project, it was a very usefull tool... untill 2.6.0 in my opinion.
I am using asyncapi to describe MQTT interfaces and recently i have converted thanks to the studio an API from 2.6.0 to 3.0.0.
Sorry, but writing SEND and RECEIVE doest not make any sense, the MQTT terms are PUBLISH and SUBSCRIBE !
I have seen a post about making generalisation for multi protocols butwill not read it: these developpement considerations cannot justify such a regression. Does Swagger use SEND and RECEIVE ?
Is it planned to correct that ?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions