-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow burning inscriptions #1333
Comments
Suggest confirmation step (eg. re-enter inscription string like deleting a GitHub repo). But, I guess that's interactive and thus bad for automation. Maybe ok without conf for CLI client... |
In general I don't think confirmation steps are a good idea for CLI tools. We let the user toast zillions of sats using |
Makes sense, warning would be more useful in a gui. |
Like burn idea. Is "scrub" as an alternative to "burn" possible? Meaning, for a mutable inscription user would have 2 options:
Particularly if it is a rare sat, user may want to clean the sat of inscriptions and keep it, or re-inscribe it, rather than burning. If immutability is implemented later (eg. via burning the Collection (Prime) Sats), there would be no option to scrub subordinate sats, only burn them. |
New burn PR = #3437 |
It should be possible to burn inscriptions, to indicate that they can't be traded or transferred.
Add a subcommand
ord wallet burn INSCRIPTION_ID
which takes an inscrpition and sends it to an OP_RETURN. It should strip it down to the minimum size and return any postage to the user. Since the intention is to burn a sat, it the output size should be 1, not zero.This should also allow including either an arbitrary UTF-8 string payload, or an arbitrary binary payload, and mark which one it is so they can be displayed correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: