Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: variable name conflicts with built in function #1448

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 19, 2024

Conversation

TerryHowe
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

The variable name len conflicts with the built in. This will simplify my other PR a bit as well.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.52%. Comparing base (9e5e766) to head (c3e5944).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1448      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.47%   85.52%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         108      108              
  Lines        3827     3827              
==========================================
+ Hits         3271     3273       +2     
+ Misses        332      331       -1     
+ Partials      224      223       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TerryHowe TerryHowe force-pushed the variable-name-conflict branch from 0dfa744 to 958e7e6 Compare July 18, 2024 15:09
Copy link
Contributor

@qweeah qweeah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with minor suggestions.

@qweeah
Copy link
Contributor

qweeah commented Jul 19, 2024

Added a unit test to cover the missing line, but I have wrongly pushed to #1447. Guess this should be merged first and merging #1447 will save that fault.

@TerryHowe TerryHowe merged commit cdb60fc into oras-project:main Jul 19, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants