Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add stable option for -H:AdditionalSecurityProviders #7369

Closed
zakkak opened this issue Sep 7, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Add stable option for -H:AdditionalSecurityProviders #7369

zakkak opened this issue Sep 7, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@zakkak
Copy link
Collaborator

zakkak commented Sep 7, 2023

Feature request

Add stable option for -H:AdditionalSecurityProviders

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Starting with 23.1 using -H:AdditionalSecurityProviders results in a warning like the following:

Warning: The option '-H:AdditionalSecurityProviders=org.wildfly.security.password.WildFlyElytronPasswordProvider' is experimental and must be enabled via '-H:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions' in the future.
Warning: Please re-evaluate whether any experimental option is required, and either remove or unlock it. The build output lists all active experimental options, including where they come from and possible alternatives. If you think an experimental option should be considered as stable, please file an issue.

Four core Quarkus Extensions (security, elytron-security-jdbc, kafka-client, infinispan-client) rely on this option to define additional security providers.

Describe the solution you'd like.

Provide a stable way to define additional security providers, either making this option stable or adding a new API option.

Describe who do you think will benefit the most.
GraalVM users and developers of libraries and frameworks which depend on GraalVM

Describe alternatives you've considered.
Wrap it in -H:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions and -H:-UnlockExperimentalVMOptions.

@zakkak
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zakkak commented Sep 7, 2023

Moved under #7370 (comment)

@zakkak zakkak closed this as completed Sep 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant