Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

java.rmi does not work due to lack of support for java Serialization #1935

Closed
eginez opened this issue Dec 4, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

java.rmi does not work due to lack of support for java Serialization #1935

eginez opened this issue Dec 4, 2019 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@eginez
Copy link
Contributor

eginez commented Dec 4, 2019

Customers might want to use java.rmi. Currently that is not possible since we lack support for serialization.

@eginez eginez self-assigned this Dec 4, 2019
@eginez eginez changed the title Verify rmi server works with native-image rmi does not work due to lack of support for Serialization Dec 7, 2019
@eginez eginez changed the title rmi does not work due to lack of support for Serialization java.rmi does not work due to lack of support for Serialization Dec 7, 2019
@eginez eginez changed the title java.rmi does not work due to lack of support for Serialization java.rmi does not work due to lack of support for java Serialization Dec 7, 2019
@eginez
Copy link
Contributor Author

eginez commented Dec 7, 2019

related to #460

@vjovanov
Copy link
Member

@eginez can we print a proper error message saying java.rmi and serialization are not supported? This should be a substitution of one of the core serialization methods that would throw an UnsupportedFeatureException with a detailed explanation.

@eginez
Copy link
Contributor Author

eginez commented Dec 18, 2019

Definitely, that sounds reasonable.

@rodrigar-mx
Copy link
Contributor

Serialization support was introduced with graalvm 21.0.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants