5 lessons contribution Review

[FA2RIDAH]

Hi everyone, @seanlip and anyone interested please review my lesson contribution. Thanks
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Ndv1a16h3WnSYpdxe4mm8Wdrc7Kg2onw?usp=sharing

[Bennykillua]

It looks good to go @FA2RIDAH Tho I noticed some lack a General Insights

[FA2RIDAH]

Hi @Bennykillua Thanks for the review. I believe the general insights part is optional for any information that is not contained in the table.

[seanlip]

Hi @FA2RIDAH, thanks for your submission. I only reviewed the first document. My main feedback is that your review could be more specific in a lot of places.

For example:

• When suggesting a correction, please provide the exact text that you would like to replace the text on the card with. This is better than "giving general directions to the lesson author". Pretend that you are the lesson author; one thing we want to see in these reviews is how you go about making the actual fixes to a lesson, not just identifying gaps. So it would be good to see the actual fixes.
• I think, in the last two rows, the point about using the commutative law to simplify might have been missed. In these cases we are using 100 and 200 precisely because the commutative law allows us to add the numbers in a different order that results in those simpler numbers. The trick is to spot pairs which add to those simpler numbers so that the subsequent additions become easier. I hope this makes sense; if you think of a way to make this clearer, feel free to include that as a suggestion.
• You mention a number of things in the "Inefficiencies" section which seem like good things to include in the main table, in a way that is more specific, has more elaboration, and includes your suggested fixes. Otherwise, the reader of this document knows that there might be some issues but has no idea how to fix them.

I hope that this helps. Thanks for submitting your contribution!

[FA2RIDAH]

Hi @seanlip Thanks for the review. I'll see to make changes in the concerned areas.