From f58f636ba9cbecffb091d976e0d28bc0dbeb1a0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xie Zhengtian Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 00:10:15 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Fix wrong word in multi-device doc (#5930) Signed-off-by: Zhengtian Xie --- docs/IE_DG/supported_plugins/MULTI.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/IE_DG/supported_plugins/MULTI.md b/docs/IE_DG/supported_plugins/MULTI.md index ac161db91478ce..a3f7dc2afc9a89 100644 --- a/docs/IE_DG/supported_plugins/MULTI.md +++ b/docs/IE_DG/supported_plugins/MULTI.md @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ Notice that until R2 you had to calculate number of requests in your application @snippet snippets/MULTI5.cpp part5 ## Using the Multi-Device with OpenVINO Samples and Benchmarking the Performance -Notice that every OpenVINO sample that supports "-d" (which stays for "device") command-line option transparently accepts the multi-device. +Notice that every OpenVINO sample that supports "-d" (which stands for "device") command-line option transparently accepts the multi-device. The [Benchmark Application](../../../inference-engine/samples/benchmark_app/README.md) is the best reference to the optimal usage of the multi-device. As discussed multiple times earlier, you don't need to setup number of requests, CPU streams or threads as the application provides optimal out of the box performance. Below is example command-line to evaluate HDDL+GPU performance with that: