You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: kay_D [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 8.12pm, Thursday, 2nd June 2011]
For building=house and =residential, a less emphasized rendering is done, which is good. But now the building outline is missing, so that - for connected buildings (e.g. terraces), the individual buidings cannot be discerned.
Author: Circeus [Added to the original trac issue at 2.28am, Friday, 25th January 2013]
Can some attention be put to that? It creates a lot of weirdness given there is really no good reason that residential building should somehow have no outline.
Reporter: kay_D
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 8.12pm, Thursday, 2nd June 2011]
For building=house and =residential, a less emphasized rendering is done, which is good. But now the building outline is missing, so that - for connected buildings (e.g. terraces), the individual buidings cannot be discerned.
Have a look at the map which some of the residential buildings "migrated" to house, and others not yet:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.848317&lon=9.960831&zoom=18&layers=M
particularly this building:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=49.849256&mlon=9.958437&zoom=18&layers=M
Oh, if I watch VERY closely, it seems like there IS an outline, a tiny bit lighter than the inside, but it's barely visible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: