Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider adding a non-Twitter social media presence #195

Closed
voxpelli opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 9 comments
Closed

Consider adding a non-Twitter social media presence #195

voxpelli opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 9 comments

Comments

@voxpelli
Copy link

With more and more people reluctant to have a presence on Twitter due to eg. Elon Musks interactions, endorsements and changes – and with eg. Threads becoming more and more interoperable with the Fediverse, adding either a Threads account or a Mastodon account would enable many more people to follow the initiative and make it less reliant on what in some circles is becoming a controversial platform.

Threads would enable both Threads users and Fediverse users to follow, so that would be the easiest one I think.

@vladh
Copy link
Member

vladh commented Oct 10, 2024

Sounds good to me. I would go for Mastodon over Threads, because this gives us a presence that is maximally insulated from any social media company's actions/reputation.

Mastodon server suggestions welcome!

@Delta456
Copy link

If we are going with other social media presence. We can also consider making a LinkedIn page.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

Who is volunteering to run these? :)

@voxpelli
Copy link
Author

One option is to use it only for posting and not so much for reading, then making it post through PR:s using eg https://github.com/humanwhocodes/toot#using-in-a-github-workflow can make sense

The nicer option would be to use something like Buffer to join all the interactions into one tool that a couple of people can collaborate on

@Delta456
Copy link

Who is volunteering to run these? :)

I can volunteer for running the LinkedIn page if everyone agrees.

@vladh
Copy link
Member

vladh commented Oct 10, 2024

I think we need to consider #197 first, so that we (1) have a consistent brand voice, even if it's just made up of super minimal guidelines, and that we (2) decide on one or two people who are responsible for outward communication, to avoid each social media account having a different voice and things getting confusing.

I think it's better to have fewer accounts that are properly managed, than give ourselves too much work. So let's think about what's really necessary. 🤔

@andypiper
Copy link

fosstodon.org may be a good fit?

@vladh
Copy link
Member

vladh commented Oct 16, 2024

Two good options that allow company/brand accounts:

  • fosstodon.org
  • mastodon.social

@vladh
Copy link
Member

vladh commented Oct 16, 2024

We're now on Mastodon! 🎉 https://fosstodon.org/@opensourcepledge

I decided on Fosstodon because a lot of community members suggested it. I'm going to run the account for now. Let's see how things go.

Closing this issue — we can discuss more platforms if we really need them.

@vladh vladh closed this as completed Oct 16, 2024
@vladh vladh mentioned this issue Oct 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants