diff --git a/src/pages/about.astro b/src/pages/about.astro
index 9703eff0..06a4700c 100644
--- a/src/pages/about.astro
+++ b/src/pages/about.astro
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ const members = filterInactiveMembers(await getMembers());
             own ecosystem are out of scope.</li>
 
           <li>Directly employing maintainers is laudable, yet outside the core
-            scope of the Pledge because of the complexity and subtle conflicts
+            scope of the Pledge, because of the complexity and subtle conflicts
             of interest that come along with that.</li>
 
           <li>It's okay if you get non-exclusive logo placement or other
@@ -134,8 +134,10 @@ const members = filterInactiveMembers(await getMembers());
             projects you fund, via code contributions, membership on an
             advisory council or board, and the like.</li>
 
-          <li>Platforms such as thanks.dev, Open Collective, and GitHub
-            Sponsors are a common way to pay maintainers, though some can also
+          <li>Platforms such as <a href="https://thanks.dev/home">thanks.dev</a>,
+            <a href="https://opencollective.com/">Open Collective</a>, and
+            <a href="https://github.com/sponsors">GitHub Sponsors</a> are a
+            common way to pay maintainers, though some can also
             be used to make payments that are out-of-scope for the Pledge. Only
             payments that fit our criteria are in scope, regardless of payment
             platform.</li>