-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 413
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
consider running bootupctl update
as part of firstboot
#3344
Comments
A big big difference here between the "stock FCOS" and RHCOS flows is that for RHCOS (well, OCP, which includes OKD-using-FCOS) we always do this OS update before landing user workloads. So we'll always have the OS update available. Ah but this definitely wants coreos/bootupd#108 |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle rotten |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Reopen the issue by commenting /close |
@openshift-bot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Today the bootloader stack is updated outside of ostree - for us via https://github.com/coreos/bootupd/
But nothing runs that by default because it's not transactional.
OTOH today, for the initial provisioning of machines, the Ignition phase is definitely not transactional when it does things like repartitioning disks. So we might as well run
bootupctl update
by default as part of the firstboot phase.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: