-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEATURE] Set the global, private, or a custom tenant as a default through OpenSearch Dashboards Security Plugin #1318
Comments
Thanks for starting this @shanilpa
|
What is the usecase for "Admin users can enable "enforce default tenant" which disregards a tenancy cookie and loads them into the default tenant instead." Once admins select a default tenant, we should enforce this automatically. Adding a second level of options is confusing. Can you elaborate on why this option may be necessary? |
[Triage] Assigning to @shanilpa since he is still working on the development. Thank you for this great start! |
Correct @jimishs . Global is the Default Tenant now. |
related: #74 |
This feature has launched: opensearch-project/security#2607 |
Context
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Currently a default tenant (global or private) can be set through YML configuration files. Configuring through these files is a complex and somewhat frustrating experience for admin users. In order to enhance the UX for configuring tenancy it would be nice to offer admin users a dynamic way to set a default tenant between the global and private tenant through the OpenSearch Dashboards Security Plugin.
Other context notes
Users / Personas
What solution would you like?
NB: These are design mockups. Some copy is placeholder and not all interactions are polished.
Mockups may differ from the final launched feature.
1. Set the global tenant as default from configure
Global.Default.Configure.mp4
2. Set the global tenant from the manage table as a quick action
Global.Default.Table.mp4
Additional Details
These UX improvements are based on work/tasks outlined in this issue and this RFC for making tenancy dynamically configurable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: