[Enhancement]Opensearch

[aceeric]

It seems historically that people have installed Opensearch with masters and data nodes separated. (E.g. https://artifacthub.io/packages/helm/bitnami/opensearch).

I'm trying to evaluate which chart to use. My inclination would be to use the "official" Opensearch chart - meaning this repository - but I'm puzzled by the decision to not take the approach of separating masters from data etc. when this seems historically to be the case. Perhaps your team has knowledge that indicates the approach taken is "proper", "preferable", etc. (Quoting to convey the intent of the question..)

Note the Amazon docs seem to prefer dedicated master nodes.

Any insight is appreciated. Thanks.

P.S. if you thought it would be valuable I would consider a PR though - the current bundled approach is pretty deeply wired into the templating...