Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About GeoIP processor #41

Closed
pietrogu opened this issue Jan 24, 2022 · 8 comments
Closed

About GeoIP processor #41

pietrogu opened this issue Jan 24, 2022 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
backlog Items to be prioritized enhancement New feature or request feature help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@pietrogu
Copy link

Hi,

i would like to ask some clarification about GeoIP processor.
In particular, is there some update mechanism for the database?
If not, how would it be possible to update (maybe using scripts)? Did someone already tried to do this?

Thank you

Pietro

@dblock
Copy link
Member

dblock commented Feb 2, 2022

I think we need to dig deeper into what we've inherited wrt the geoip processor (https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/tree/main/modules/ingest-geoip and friends). I also found https://discuss.opendistrocommunity.dev/t/logstash-geoip-filter-no-longer-oss/5225 that seems related.

@pietrogu What were you able to get working in OpenSearch wrt geoip processor?

@pietrogu
Copy link
Author

pietrogu commented Feb 4, 2022

Yes it seems to work in OpenSearch: if I implement geoip in a pipeline most of the time the localization is provided, but in my understanding it is not possible for now to update the database over time: the only way should be to shutdown the cluster first (and in a production environment is not a good solution due to downtime)

@anasalkouz anasalkouz added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 8, 2022
@CEHENKLE CEHENKLE transferred this issue from opensearch-project/OpenSearch Mar 29, 2022
@CEHENKLE
Copy link
Member

@opensearch-project/geospatial Hey folks - I chatted with @nknize about this, and we didn't pick up geoip work when we forked. It seems like something that the folks on this repo could dig into.

Thanks,
/C

@CEHENKLE CEHENKLE removed their assignment Mar 29, 2022
@vamshin vamshin added good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Jul 22, 2022
@navneet1v
Copy link
Collaborator

This seems to be a feature request. Please do +1 if you need this feature to be priortized.

@navneet1v navneet1v added the backlog Items to be prioritized label Aug 17, 2022
@sempervictus
Copy link

GeoIP resolution is a rather critical element in security-relevant pipelines such as that used by Wazuh and various network monitoring solutions (flow analysis and such). Would very much aid in easing migration from pre-licensing-nonsense ES.

@heemin32
Copy link
Collaborator

heemin32 commented Mar 3, 2023

We started working on this feature. opensearch-project/OpenSearch#5856

@heemin32 heemin32 removed the good first issue Good for newcomers label Sep 15, 2023
@heemin32
Copy link
Collaborator

heemin32 commented Oct 4, 2023

New IP2Geo processor is launched. https://opensearch.org/docs/latest/api-reference/ingest-apis/processors/ip2geo/
Closing the issue now.

@heemin32 heemin32 closed this as completed Oct 4, 2023
@sempervictus
Copy link

Thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backlog Items to be prioritized enhancement New feature or request feature help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants