-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bugfix] [Tiered Caching] Make ehcache disk cache size setting be ByteSizeValue rather than long #13902
Closed
peteralfonsi
wants to merge
5
commits into
opensearch-project:main
from
peteralfonsi:ehcache-size-setting-bugfix
Closed
[Bugfix] [Tiered Caching] Make ehcache disk cache size setting be ByteSizeValue rather than long #13902
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7ce5180
Make ehcache size setting take ByteSizeValue
294cdac
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into ehcache-size-settin…
4510966
rerun failed security check
934eefd
Changed logic to use new setting and deprecate old one
27c7b22
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into ehcache-size-settin…
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will this cause any issue with upgrade path where older nodes have the setting as
long
type vs new nodes has it asByteSizeValue
type ? Probably not given it isNodeScope
but wanted to double confirm on this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sohami - Thinking again on this, it will break for old nodes. Since once the setting is preserved as memorySizeSetting in the cluster state, old nodes will not be able to apply the latest cluster state and cluster manager will kick those nodes out of the cluster.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've pushed a new change so that there's a new ByteSizeSetting "max_size" rather than "max_size_in_bytes", which has been deprecated. If the new setting is present it uses that value. If not, it looks for the deprecated setting and uses that. If neither are present it uses the default value.
I'm not totally sure this complexity is worth it, it might just be better to keep the long setting as it was before. Let me know what you think @jainankitk @sohami