We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I think the easist way to pull out these numbers is to write a new measures file that tracks the monthly changes in these statistics:
We also wish to do some data exploration with the following statistics:
has_nonpf_condition - to look at patients with a PF consultation, but with a condition that is NOT part of the pharmacy first conditions codelist.
has_nonpf_condition
has_nonpf_med - to look at patients with a PF consultation, but with prescribed medication that is NOT part of the pharmacy first med codelist.
has_nonpf_med
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We will not be undergoing data exploration as part of this issue and linked PR (#66), but will carry this out in sub issue (#67)
Sorry, something went wrong.
milanwiedemann
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
I think the easist way to pull out these numbers is to write a new measures file that tracks the monthly changes in these statistics:
We also wish to do some data exploration with the following statistics:
has_nonpf_condition
- to look at patients with a PF consultation, but with a condition that is NOT part of the pharmacy first conditions codelist.has_nonpf_med
- to look at patients with a PF consultation, but with prescribed medication that is NOT part of the pharmacy first med codelist.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: