-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Possible next steps for r-docker #101
Comments
(sorry for long post) Below is what I think would be the most stable and easiest approach for you to maintain long term (because it's what
A subtlety here is that if you followed this approach you wouldn't want users on
Also, I have made a second version of the reverse engineered Dockerfile which minimises the number of layers (apparently better Dockerfile practice).
I will try and keep both upto date if additional packages are added. |
Here are some possible next steps for r-docker, following a meeting with @bloodearnest, @milanwiedemann, and @rebkwok. They're arranged from least to most effort, over the short-to-medium term.
Continue to update the existing image. Address:
Fix the image.
Create a new - and reversion the existing - image.
r:legacy
; the new image could becomer:latest
s/r:latest/r:legacy/
Handle dependencies better.
opensafely add-dependency ...
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: