Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Study leads #4193

Open
iaindillingham opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Study leads #4193

iaindillingham opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@iaindillingham
Copy link
Member

The IG team have asked for information about applications' study leads.

Currently, an application is associated with a study lead. The study lead was the current study lead at the point when the application was approved. Ideally, when the study lead leaves the organization, the application should be associated with a different study lead. Ideally, an application's previous study leads should also be retained.

At present, it is possible to determine an application's current study lead and previous study leads by querying the Git history of the "Approved projects" page. This page is built from a collection of files that are mostly updated by @tomodwyer and @LiamHart-hub.

Based on a Slack thread,1 we think Liam would be happy with the current/previous information coming from the "Approved projects" page. (The application would be associated with the study lead when the application was approved.) However, clearly querying the Git history is not ideal.

Footnotes

  1. https://bennettoxford.slack.com/archives/C069SADHP1Q/p1710170906365829

@iaindillingham
Copy link
Member Author

I'm going to move this to Later. There isn't a need for information about applications' study leads to be stored in job-server now; the "Approved Projects" page is a good, albeit short-term, alternative.

@lucyb
Copy link
Contributor

lucyb commented Apr 3, 2024

I've added this to the list of things for a future initiative around permissions and I don't think we should start work on it just yet, so I'll move it out of the backlog. I think we need to gather some more requirements about what a study lead does, before deciding whether/how to model it within Job Server.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants