-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move TPP backend to ubuntu VM #46
Comments
Update: We have a VM at 192.168.201.4, currently with ~236G of RAM and 180G of disk. I've submitted some jobs to the backend, it ran, and we can view the outputs on Level 4 using the browser there to talk to the VM. Next steps:
Swtiching over:
|
Related: we need proper TLS for release-hatch: #50 |
Update:
Work ongoing:
Next: plan and schedule the migration. |
Update:
We need to schedule a date after Easter for the migration, and communicate to users. The actual migration plans has been migrated to separate ticket. |
We need to move to using a linux VM we can fully manage, rather than the pre-baked VM that comes with Docker for Windows.
Benefits
The basic proposal is:
archive.ubuntu.com:80
andsecurity.ubuntu.com:80
so we can keep the VM up to date.Implications
File storage is now on the VM.
This gives us the best possible IO, but changes how the files will be accessed.
Note: we will need to copy in the current windows based level3 and 4 directories into the VM as part of the switch over.
Only users with ssh access will be able to log in to view the level 3 files.
Level 4 access
Ideally, release-hatch running on the VM will provide mediated access to the level 4 files for viewing by level 4 researchers. However, if that's not sufficient in the short term, then the VM can expose a SMB fileshare of the level 4 files, which can be used by the TPP maintained sync script to copy to the TPP Level 4 VM for a while.
Level 3 access
In theory, only the tech team need access to the level 3 files, which they can do via ssh. However, if we need to provide non-ssh access to view level 3 files, then we can possibly do an SMB fileshare to the Windows host, but would really rather not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: