Golang util, helper, ambiguous package naming

[pwdel]

From style decisions document:

https://google.github.io/styleguide/go/decisions

Go packages have a name specified on the package declaration, separate from the import path. The package name matters more for readability than the path.
Go package names should be related to what the package provides. Naming a package just util , helper , common or similar is usually a poor choice (it can be used as part of the name though). Uninformative names make the code harder to read, and if used too broadly they are liable to cause needless import conflicts.
Instead, consider what the callsite will look like.