You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In our system lot of the above fields are in uuid v1 which would fail to validate as UUID4 (because the version number 4 is not present in the uuid), this stops us from ingesting those device_id using the agency api. The agency api throws not a valid UUID4, would you please consider removing the validation of UUID4 and let it be just an UUID to match the provider api.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Opened PR #249 to relax Agency to require UUID rather than UUID4. Sandbox is updated as of now (Friday 2/22 9A PST). Will close this after PR is merged.
In the current specification the api mandates that the following fields are UUID4 (as per https://github.com/CityOfLosAngeles/mobility-data-specification/tree/1b0fb7ba707d85d0cfbc8cb5d4bd2ae90fd351e1/agency )
This breaks backward compatibility though, the provider api didn't require these fields to be UUID4, and it needed it just to be an UUID as per: https://github.com/CityOfLosAngeles/mobility-data-specification/tree/1b0fb7ba707d85d0cfbc8cb5d4bd2ae90fd351e1/provider
In our system lot of the above fields are in uuid v1 which would fail to validate as UUID4 (because the version number 4 is not present in the uuid), this stops us from ingesting those device_id using the agency api. The agency api throws
not a valid UUID4
, would you please consider removing the validation of UUID4 and let it be just an UUID to match the provider api.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: