You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've now (finally) taken a look at the listen-rehearsal-mark branch, at least on the example file, and I have a few questions:
In general I think it is a very good thing to have mods relative to such hooks, as this will make them more robust for a significant number of use cases where the time structure of a score isn't completely pre-set.
However, it's not always acceptable to be forced to add a rehearsal mark for that. So: is it possible to use invisible marks as hooks, either by making an explicit \mark invisible or (rather?) by introducing a new type of object? So the user would insert some thing like a \eeHook "sectionA" somewhere and the mod refers to that.
I think the naming \editionModMarked should be reconsidered. When reading the example file I wouldn't have guessed what that means. That name rather indicates that something has been marked - rather what we are looking forward with the IDs.
Maybe it would be better to integrate the functionality in the \editionMod command as an option?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The name is just s scrap-name. Perhaps we find a reasonable name, when we solved 2.
I used rehearsalMarks as a first solution. An eeHook- or eeMark-event would be a good thing. They could optionally produce a RehearsalMark. So the rehearsalMarks are used here, to have a working solution right now, but that shall not be the final state.
I've now (finally) taken a look at the listen-rehearsal-mark branch, at least on the example file, and I have a few questions:
In general I think it is a very good thing to have mods relative to such hooks, as this will make them more robust for a significant number of use cases where the time structure of a score isn't completely pre-set.
However, it's not always acceptable to be forced to add a rehearsal mark for that. So: is it possible to use invisible marks as hooks, either by making an explicit
\mark
invisible or (rather?) by introducing a new type of object? So the user would insert some thing like a\eeHook "sectionA"
somewhere and the mod refers to that.I think the naming
\editionModMarked
should be reconsidered. When reading the example file I wouldn't have guessed what that means. That name rather indicates that something has been marked - rather what we are looking forward with the IDs.Maybe it would be better to integrate the functionality in the
\editionMod
command as an option?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: