Voting CPC Representatives from Projects #152
Comments
|
webhint: @molant |
|
Appium representatives will be @dpgraham and myself 👋 |
|
As mentioned in webdriverio/webdriverio#3824 for WebdriverIO it will be TSC members of the project, depending who is available in US/Europe. These are:
|
|
Architect's nominee is @kborchers per architect/architect#349 |
|
Node-RED's |
|
TSC progress on electing one Node.js rep, nodejs/TSC#689 CommComm will kick off process as well. |
|
Messageformat's nominee will be @eemeli (messageformat/messageformat#232). |
|
CommComm nominations now open: nodejs/community-committee#470 |
|
@mcollina has been confirmed as the TSC Node.js Voting CPC member. @amiller-gh will confirm when the CommComm Node.js voting member has been confirmed. |
|
Thank you for taking on the work, @mcollina 🙏🏽 |
|
CommComm will announce a CPC rep on 30th April. Progress is on nodejs/community-committee#470. |
|
For Dojo we would like to nominate Matt Gadd ( @matt-gadd) and me (Dylan Schiemann, @dylans). Let me know if that’s fine or if you have any questions. |
|
For webpack we nominate @TheLarkInn Sean Larkin and @evenstensberg Even Stensberg as representatives. |
|
Joe Sepi (@joesepi) has been elected the CommComm voting CPC member: nodejs/community-committee#470 |
|
WOWOWOW way to go everyone, we got all our impact reps & nominees in right on schedule!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
follow-up ask to all reps & nominees - please take a sec and share your meeting time availability on this spreadsheet - note that there are 2 tabs! |
|
Heads up, everyone who was selected or nominated to the CPC from an Impact, Growth, or At Large project has now been invited to join this repo for write access. Please check your notifications! |
|
@matt-gadd, @dpgraham, and @evenstensberg - I need your email addresses to populate the mailing list, please. Can you drop me a line at [email protected]? |
|
In the most recent meeting, it was suggested and there was discussion around having all nominees from growth and at-large projects be voting members this first year to help bootstrap the council and further the work with more hands. (Rather than voting it down to only 2) One thing I notice is that 3 of those 5 nominees are IBMers. If we were to invite all 5 of them to be voting members, that would make 4 out of 15 voting members IBMers (including me). The language states no more than 25% from one company. @boneskull said he would withdraw if this was an issue. I just want to share the situation for the group to discuss. |
|
(4 of 15 is 26.66%) |
|
Thanks for pointing it out. I think one of them should drop out then. |
|
or we could add another rep to make it 25% 😇 |
|
I'd like to +1 what @Jonahss suggested, one of the IBM members should drop out. |
|
+1 to @Jonahss proposal |
|
It was proposed last week--and discussed then as well as today's meeting--that we take on all growth and at-large nominees to bootstrap the CPC group for the first year and then next voting cycle elect 2 members from growth and at-large projects. There seems to be general consensus on this proposal. The only issue is that that would put too many people from one company. We will work out that offline, one member from that company will withdraw, we will post an update on this thread soon with the withdrawn member. (some discussion above) Beyond this one issue, we will assume consensus unless objections are noted here. Thanks! |
|
Having discussed with @boneskull, I withdraw my nomination. |
|
Thanks @knolleary With Nick withdrawing from the race we have our voting members! I've added everyone to the @openjs-foundation/cpc-voting-members team, which is a child team of @openjs-foundation/cpc They have write access on this repo! Closing the issue |
|
Hey y’all. I made a mistake. When I posted shared the CPC nominees in our IBM slack chat, the name @eemeli was highlighted and when I looked at that users profile there were things that made me assume the IBMer and Eemeli were the same person. THEY ARE NOT. I should have checked this but I didn’t. Therefore, with the original intent being an inclination to have more voting members actively participating to “bootstrap” the first year of the CPC, I propose we allow @knolleary to be a voting member as well. Sorry for the mixup. :/ |
|
so we're clear, @eemeli, you don't work at IBM, right? |
|
This is correct. I do not, and never have, worked for IBM. On the other hand, if this is the most indirect recruitment pitch I've received so far, please do get in touch with me directly as well. |
|
I went through and did my best to map folks to their affiliation Node: Matteo Collina (@mcollina ) NearForm & Joe Sepi (@joesepi) IBM Antón Molleda (@molant) MSFT Total: 15 IBM: 3 Did I get anything wrong? |
|
If we're listing these associations anywhere, I'd appreciate myself as being listed under Vincit, as they do pay my salary and are sponsoring some of my work on messageformat. |
|
This was briefly discussed in person at Collab Summit CPC meeting just now and there were multiple +1s and no objections to including @knolleary as a voting member. See above comments for more context. |
|
Sorry for the very delayed reply... Matt Gadd is also with SitePen. |
Creating this issue to capture the appointments and nominees for the CPC per a question from one of our projects!
Impact Project Representative Appointments (up to 2 per project)
Growth & At Large Nominees (up to 2)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: