[PRE REVIEW]: ConFluxPro: A toolkit for soil gas analysis

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @valentingar (Valentin Gartiser)
Repository: https://github.com/valentingar/confluxpro/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss_submission
Version: 1.2.1
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4fde90a1f5a95fc80b37e8ab5ddf8d3d"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4fde90a1f5a95fc80b37e8ab5ddf8d3d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4fde90a1f5a95fc80b37e8ab5ddf8d3d/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4fde90a1f5a95fc80b37e8ab5ddf8d3d)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @valentingar. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@valentingar if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.06 s (2140.1 files/s, 295052.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               92           1915           2485           6552
XML                              1              0            203           1925
SVG                             14              0              0           1119
Markdown                         5            244              0            968
Rmd                              6            217            660            405
YAML                             4             21             12            197
TeX                              1              0              0            152
JSON                             1              0              0             21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           124           2397           3360          11339
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   492	Valentin Gartiser
     2	valentingar

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 829

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf. Problem with ORCID (0000-0000-0000-0000) for Martin Maier. Invalid ORCID.

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1097/00010694-197205000-00006 is OK
- 10.1016/s0168-1923(03)00112-6 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01142.x is OK
- 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.03.006 is OK
- 10.3390/app10238653 is OK
- 10.3389/ffgc.2022.826298 is OK
- 10.2136/vzj2009.0193 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01751 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.06393 is OK
- 10.32614/cran.package.gasfluxes is OK
- 10.32614/cran.package.neonsoilflux is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- None

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683093.001.0001 may be a valid DOI for title: Soil physics with python

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[kthyng]

👋 @valentingar - note that your paper does not compile. Please follow the example paper and note that you can click on the error above to find out more about it. Then use the command @editorialbot generate pdf after making changes to the .md file to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.

[valentingar]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

FluxCalR: a R package for calculating CO2 and CH4 fluxes from static chambers
Submitting author: @junbinzhao
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @jhollist, @ha0ye
Similarity score: 0.8027

PROFFASTpylot: Running PROFFAST with Python
Submitting author: @feldl
Handling editor: @rwegener2 (Active)
Reviewers: @usethedata, @simonom
Similarity score: 0.7411

MetObs - a Python toolkit for using non-traditional meteorological observations
Submitting author: @vergauwenthomas
Handling editor: @hugoledoux (Active)
Reviewers: @ashwinvis, @Zeitsperre
Similarity score: 0.6931

CRNPy: An Open-Source Python Library for Cosmic-Ray Neutron Probe Data Processing
Submitting author: @joaquinperaza
Handling editor: @elbeejay (Active)
Reviewers: @jlarsen-usgs, @danpower101
Similarity score: 0.6929

growR: R Implementation of the Vegetation Model ModVege
Submitting author: @kuadrat
Handling editor: @mikemahoney218 (Active)
Reviewers: @shubhamjain15, @RobLBaker
Similarity score: 0.6880

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[valentingar]

Hello @kthyng!
Thank you for pointing that out! I've updated the ORCIDs and the paper should now have compiled correctly.

[valentingar]

Potential Reviewers:

• junbinzhao - Author of FluxCalR - published in JOSS

• jmzobitz - Author of neonSoilFlux

• Roland Fuß - Author of gasfluxes

And from the list searching for keywords (soil, gas, flux, CO2, CH4, methane):

• Saryace

[kthyng]

Hi @valentingar and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:

• OSI-approved license
• Installation instructions
• Documentation exists at all
• Tests of some sort
• Check paper (make sure compiles, read through, check for length 250-1000 words)
• Substantial scholarly effort
• Clear research application

In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them.

[kthyng]

Please check the capitalization in your references. You can preserve capitalization by placing {} around characters/words in your .bib file. ("european", "python", "r", etc)

We have a backlog of submissions so I will add this to our waitlist. Thanks for your patience.

[valentingar]

Hello @kthyng - great news! Thank you for considering our submission. We are looking forward to the review.

I fixed the @editorialbot comments and capitalization in the references and will regenerate the pdf now.
valentingar/ConFluxPro@4a73369

[valentingar]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

FluxCalR: a R package for calculating CO2 and CH4 fluxes from static chambers
Submitting author: @junbinzhao
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @jhollist, @ha0ye
Similarity score: 0.7890

PROFFASTpylot: Running PROFFAST with Python
Submitting author: @feldl
Handling editor: @rwegener2 (Active)
Reviewers: @usethedata, @simonom
Similarity score: 0.7222

CRNPy: An Open-Source Python Library for Cosmic-Ray Neutron Probe Data Processing
Submitting author: @joaquinperaza
Handling editor: @elbeejay (Active)
Reviewers: @jlarsen-usgs, @danpower101
Similarity score: 0.6867

growR: R Implementation of the Vegetation Model ModVege
Submitting author: @kuadrat
Handling editor: @mikemahoney218 (Active)
Reviewers: @shubhamjain15, @RobLBaker
Similarity score: 0.6809

GasChromatographySimulator.jl
Submitting author: @JanLeppert
Handling editor: @rkurchin (Active)
Reviewers: @ma-sadeghi, @bonh
Similarity score: 0.6770

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.