-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: SynxFlow: A GPU-accelerated Python package for multi-hazard simulations #7415
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: 🟡 License found: |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: BoxKit: A Python library to manage analysis of block-structured simulation datasets Simulation Decomposition in Python Underworld2: Python Geodynamics Modelling for Desktop, HPC and Cloud pyDeltaRCM: a flexible numerical delta model Pyrokinetics - A Python library to standardise gyrokinetic analysis |
Hi @xiaxilin and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:
In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them. |
|
@AnjaliSandip Can you edit this submission? |
@editorialbot invite @AnjaliSandip as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@kthyng , I am happy to edit this submission. |
@editorialbot assign @AnjaliSandip as editor |
Assigned! @AnjaliSandip is now the editor |
Thank you for promptly looking into this submission. I have updated the paper to address your comments about the references. |
@xiaxilin , if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers, please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission. |
@AnjaliSandip I have had a quick look through the list, and thought the following people may be interested christopheredsall |
👋 @christopheredsall, @cheginit, & @shulele, would you review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html. |
@AnjaliSandip Unfortunately, I won't be able to review this submission. I am swamped with my editing and review activities through the end of the year. |
@AnjaliSandip Sure, I can give that a go. |
@editorialbot add @christopheredsall as reviewer |
@christopheredsall added to the reviewers list! |
@xiaxilin, we need at least one more reviewer to start the review process. Do you have any other suggestions for potential reviewers? If so, please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people who have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission. |
@xiaxilin, Do you have any other suggestions for potential reviewers? If so, please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people who have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission. |
👋 @PabloIbannez, @thivinanandh, & @pradeepin2 would you review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html. |
Hi @AnjaliSandip , I would be glad to accept the review |
Hi @AnjaliSandip |
Hi @AnjaliSandip, I'd be happy to review this submission. |
@editorialbot add @PabloIbannez reviewer |
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
|
@editorialbot add @PabloIbannez as reviewer |
@PabloIbannez added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot add @thivinanandh as reviewer |
@thivinanandh added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #7586. |
I was able to find two other suitable reviewers. Thanks. |
Submitting author: @xiaxilin (Xilin Xia)
Repository: https://github.com/SynxFlow/SynxFlow
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: v1.0
Editor: @AnjaliSandip
Reviewers: @christopheredsall, @PabloIbannez, @thivinanandh
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @xiaxilin. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@xiaxilin if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: