[PRE REVIEW]: Gene-based scientific literature visualiser (GeSciLiVis): an R package for interrogating published literature for experimentally-derived gene lists within a priori user-defined biological context

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @marina-leer (Marina Leer)
Repository: https://github.com/marina-leer/GeSciLiVis
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 1.2.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d8f42a049d4756c3b3c3a691997daf6"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d8f42a049d4756c3b3c3a691997daf6/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d8f42a049d4756c3b3c3a691997daf6/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d8f42a049d4756c3b3c3a691997daf6)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @marina-leer. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@marina-leer if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1177/1357633X13519036 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-021-94897-9 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gki005 is OK
- 10.1038/s42003-024-06177-7 is OK
- 10.1093/genetics/iyad031 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-023-35597-4 is OK
- 10.1006/geno.2002.6747 is OK
- 10.7287/PEERJ.PREPRINTS.3179V2 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkac1032 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkq1237 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkv1189 is OK
- 10.1016/j.stem.2017.02.009 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- None

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.03 s (1938.7 files/s, 240859.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSV                             18              0              0           3720
Markdown                         9            245              0            899
TeX                              1             13              0            634
R                               21            117            165            395
YAML                             1              1              4             19
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            50            376            169           5667
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   134	Marina Leer
     3	Georgeloy

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1101

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

LISC: A Python Package for Scientific Literature Collection and Analysis
Submitting author: @TomDonoghue
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @timClicks, @linuxscout
Similarity score: 0.6957

geneXplainR: An R interface for the geneXplain platform
Submitting author: @pstegma
Handling editor: @mgymrek (Retired)
Reviewers: @selbouhaddani
Similarity score: 0.6897

dtrackr: An R package for tracking the provenance of data
Submitting author: @robchallen
Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active)
Reviewers: @debruine, @craig-willis
Similarity score: 0.6824

DeepOF: a Python package for supervised and unsupervised pattern recognition in mice motion tracking data
Submitting author: @lucasmiranda42
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @cellistigs, @edeno
Similarity score: 0.6754

MousebreedeR: A novel software to assist in the design of breeding schema for complex genotypes of experimental organisms
Submitting author: @sportiellomike
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @yjunechoe, @jsun
Similarity score: 0.6742

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@marina-leer thanks for this submission. Unfortunately upon review this work does not conform to our substantial scholarly effort criteria. We will now proceed to reject this submission.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot reject

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.