-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: Psymple: A Python package for complex systems modelling #7221
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: 🟡 License found: |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: PySD: System Dynamics Modeling in Python Simframe: A Python Framework for Scientific Simulations SimuPy: A Python framework for modeling and simulating dynamical systems py-pde: A Python package for solving partial differential equations DE-Sim: an object-oriented, discrete-event simulation tool for data-intensive modeling of complex systems in Python |
👋 @GJHSimmons - thanks for your submission. While I look for an editor, you could work on the incorrectly formatted and possibly missing DOIs that editorialbot suggests, but note that some may be incorrect. Please feel free to make changes to your .bib file, then use the command |
Also, JOSS papers typically don't use addresses in the affiliations, just institutions and countries. |
Finally, your paper is a bit long. JOSS suggests 250-1000 words, and your paper is a little over 1600. Is there anything you can remove, perhaps pointing to documentation or the repository instead? |
👋 @prashjha - Do you think you could edit this submission? |
@editorialbot invite @prashjha as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@editorialbot check references |
Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: PySD: System Dynamics Modeling in Python Simframe: A Python Framework for Scientific Simulations SimuPy: A Python framework for modeling and simulating dynamical systems py-pde: A Python package for solving partial differential equations DE-Sim: an object-oriented, discrete-event simulation tool for data-intensive modeling of complex systems in Python |
@editorialbot check references |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: PySD: System Dynamics Modeling in Python py-pde: A Python package for solving partial differential equations SimuPy: A Python framework for modeling and simulating dynamical systems DE-Sim: an object-oriented, discrete-event simulation tool for data-intensive modeling of complex systems in Python Simframe: A Python Framework for Scientific Simulations |
@danielskatz Thank you for proceeding quickly. I've fixed DOIs and affiliations. Flagging that two chapters (here and here) have stated but inactivated DOIs. I've fallen back to the full book which has an active DOI. I'll need some deeper advice on paper length. I understand the 'description' section is unusual, but contains important citations for how the package was built which don't belong in the statement of need or documentation. How is this usually handled for JOSS articles? |
I'm not sure if this will help you or not, but might be worth remembering that the paper is for users of the software, whether end users or developers. And if you can't do anything, perhaps reviewers will have suggestions later in the process. Also, as a side note, if you are going to say "see Author", you should encode this in markdown as "see @author", not "see [@author]" The latter (using the []s) is just for parenthetical references. |
Just a ping about this... |
Thank you for the invitation to edit, @danielskatz. Happy to help. |
@editorialbot assign me as editor |
Assigned! @prashjha is now the editor |
Hello @GJHSimmons, could you please look at the JOSS reviewer database and suggest a few names who can review your submission? |
Hi @prashjha, thank you for agreeing to edit! I've done a quick search and got some ideas for reviewers, both for the mathematical/systems context and the ecological background context, depending on what you think is needed. Let me know if you need more suggestions. Complex systems, mathematics context Ecological or biological flavoured modelling/dynamic systems context |
I am available to review this package. |
@GJHSimmons Thanks for considering me as a reviewer. |
Happy to review as well. |
Dear @pitmonticone, @SunnyXu, and @gartavanis: thank you for your interest. We need two reviewers, so I will select the two based on the response order. |
@editorialbot add @pitmonticone as reviewer |
@pitmonticone added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot add @SunnyXu as reviewer |
@SunnyXu added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #7364. |
Submitting author: @GJHSimmons (George Simmons)
Repository: https://github.com/casasglobal-org/psymple/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-review
Version: v0.3.4
Editor: @prashjha
Reviewers: @pitmonticone, @SunnyXu
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @GJHSimmons. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@GJHSimmons if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: