[PRE REVIEW]: mvs: Methods for high-dimensional multi-view learning

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @wsvanloon (Wouter van Loon)
Repository: https://gitlab.com/wsvanloon/mvs
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper
Version: v2.0.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8ffc179d4f37dec2e046682edf43abee"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8ffc179d4f37dec2e046682edf43abee/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8ffc179d4f37dec2e046682edf43abee/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8ffc179d4f37dec2e046682edf43abee)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @wsvanloon. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@wsvanloon if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1093/bib/bbw113 is OK
- 10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.007 is OK
- 10.1016/j.inffus.2017.06.004 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.2202113119 is OK
- 10.32614/CRAN.package.multiview is OK
- 10.32614/CRAN.package.Spectrum is OK
- 10.32614/CRAN.package.LUCIDus is OK
- 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.03.007 is OK
- 10.1007/s11634-024-00587-5 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2022.830630 is OK
- 10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102524 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v033.i01 is OK
- 10.32614/CRAN.package.foreach is OK
- 10.1214/19-sts733 is OK
- 10.1198/016214506000000735 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v045.i03 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597 is OK
- 10.1007/978-981-13-3029-2 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Multiblock Data Fusion in Statistics and Machine L...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Getting Started with doParallel and foreach

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-642-22218-4_8 may be a valid DOI for title: A Case Study of Stacked Multi-View Learning in Dem...

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.02 s (1487.0 files/s, 181348.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               15            154            501            899
XML                              1              0              1            622
Markdown                         3             83              0            263
TeX                              2             23              0            213
JSON                             1              0              0             23
Rmd                              1             39             59             23
YAML                             1              1              4             19
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            24            300            565           2062
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    75	wsvanloon
    70	Wouter van Loon
     3	Marjolein Fokkema
     2	Fokkema

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1379

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v2.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Multiblock PLS: Block dependent prediction modeling for Python
Submitting author: @lvermue
Handling editor: @brainstorm (Retired)
Reviewers: @arokem
Similarity score: 0.6674

rbmi: A R package for standard and reference-based multiple imputation methods
Submitting author: @nociale
Handling editor: @fboehm (Active)
Reviewers: @DanielRivasMD, @JoranTiU
Similarity score: 0.6593

mikropml: User-Friendly R Package for Supervised Machine Learning Pipelines
Submitting author: @pschloss
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @JonnyTran, @FedericoComoglio
Similarity score: 0.6576

verdata: An R package for analyzing data from the Truth Commission in Colombia
Submitting author: @thegargiulian
Handling editor: @Nikoleta-v3 (Active)
Reviewers: @jamesmbaazam, @JosiahParry
Similarity score: 0.6561

Multi-view-AE: A Python package for multi-view autoencoder models
Submitting author: @alawryaguila
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @abhi-glitchhg, @Saran-nns
Similarity score: 0.6544

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[crvernon]

@editorialbot query scope

👋 @wsvanloon - thanks for your submission to JOSS. I am going to run this one by our larger editorial board due to it's smaller code base to ensure it meets our substantial scholarly effort requirement. This should take about two weeks at the most. I'll let you know what I hear back ASAP.

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[crvernon]

@editorialbot reject

👋 @wsvanloon - after further review from our larger editorial board, we have to reject this submission at this time due to not meeting our substantial scholarly effort requirements due to the project's smaller codebase.

Thank you so much for submitting your work to JOSS and we wish you the best in your future development activities.

[crvernon]

@editorialbot reject

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.