-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: WeibullR.plotly: Interactive Weibull Probability Plots #6994
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: Visualizations with statistical details: The ggstatsplot approach FielDHub: A Shiny App for Design of Experiments in Life Sciences lifelines: survival analysis in Python dtrackr: An R package for tracking the provenance of data BayesianNetwork: Interactive Bayesian Network Modeling and Analysis |
👋 @paulgovan - how can we understand what the software is specifically in this submission? The code is the repository seems quite large for the functionality described in the paper. Can you explain? |
Hi @danielskatz, This software is intended to serve as an add-on to the WeibullR package, a well-known R package for life data analysis, reliability analysis, and Weibull analysis. It enhances Weibull modeling by enabling interactive, web-based plotting options—a feature commonly found in commercial software but, to the best of my knowledge, not available in open source software. In addition to the core code, the software package includes documentation, tutorials, unit tests, and other supporting resources, which may contribute to its larger size. |
Is there a "diff" that I could use to understand what was written for this package vs what already existed? E.g., are all the 200k lines of C/C++ headers original to this package? |
I just reviewed the report above, and something seems off. The software is primarily written in R, and is a few hundred lines of code. It appears that some of the HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files might be pulled from the gh-pages branch (website), while the core code is in the main branch. |
@editorialbot set main as branch |
Done! branch is now main |
@editorialbot check repository |
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
👋 @paulgovan - thanks, that was the issue. Due to the relatively small amount of code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. You should hear back in a week or so. |
@editorialbot query scope |
Submission flagged for editorial review. |
👋 @paulgovan - I'm sorry to say that after discussion amongst the JOSS editors, we have decided that this submission does not meet the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#other-venues-for-reviewing-and-publishing-software-packages for other suggestions for how you might receive credit for your work. |
@editorialbot reject |
Paper rejected. |
Submitting author: @paulgovan (Paul Govan)
Repository: https://github.com/paulgovan/WeibullR.plotly
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: v0.2.1
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @paulgovan. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@paulgovan if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: