-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: AdOpT-NET0: A technology-focused Python package for the optimization of multi-energy systems #6988
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: RHEIA: Robust design optimization of renewable Hydrogen and dErIved energy cArrier systems The Spreadsheet Energy System Model Generator (SESMG): A tool for the optimization of urban energy systems autumn: A Python library for dynamic modelling of captured CO_2 cost potential curves GHEtool: An open-source tool for borefield sizing in Python Mat-dp: An open-source Python model for analysing material demand projections and their environmental implications, which result from building low-carbon systems. |
Hi @JeanWi, thanks for your submission. Unfortunately, we don't have any editors in this area available to handle this at the moment, so I have to put this on our waitlist. In the meantime, any reviewer recommendations would be welcome (though please don't tag/request them directly). |
Dear Kyle,
|
@editorialbot invite @AdamRJensen as editor Hi @AdamRJensen, could you edit this? It looks in your area of expertise. I've checked that it meets the basic requirements for JOSS (at a surface level, at least!). |
There was a problem inviting the user to edit this submission. |
@editorialbot invite @AdamRJensen as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@editorialbot assign @AdamRJensen as editor |
Assigned! @AdamRJensen is now the editor |
@JeanWi do you have the GitHub usernames for these people? If so, please write them here but leave out the "@" symbol so they don't get tagged just yet. |
Hi all,
|
👋 @martavp, @ClaraBuettner, & @sjpfenninger, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
Thanks for the invitation @AdamRJensen and I'm sorry I cannot accept it. I don't have the bandwidth to review this during the next couple of months, but I do agree JOSS does a very good job and I'll be happy to support it as a reviewer in the future. |
@editorialbot assign @AdamRJensen as editor (just trying to debug some JOSS dashboard issues Adam) |
Assigned! @AdamRJensen is now the editor |
👋 @FLomb, @ClaraBuettner, & @sjpfenninger, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
@AdamRJensen, I have no remaining capacity this year, sorry! |
@AdamRJensen I am also unable to help right now; best of luck! |
👋 @trevorb1, @jtock, & @GregorBecker, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html Personally, I volunteer as an editor for JOSS because I think JOSS does a fantastic job at supporting replicable open-source science! |
Hi @AdamRJensen; thanks so much for the offer to review this submission! I just read the paper and it looks really interesting! In terms of the timeline, what is your expectation? I have a deliverable due the first week of November, and will be quite busy until then. However, I am available after that and can commit to having the review done by the weekend of Nov 23rd. I may be able to get it done a little earlier than this, but I don't want to over promise. If this works with your timeline, please add me as a reviewer! Else, if you need the review done earlier, I will not be able to review. |
@editorialbot add @trevorb1 as reviewer @trevorb1 That is no problem at all, just happy to have you onboard 🥳 |
@trevorb1 added to the reviewers list! |
Dear @AdamRJensen, due to an unfinished JOSS review I am involved in, I am unfortunately unable to participate in this review due to time constraints. |
@JeanWi Could you please suggest some additional potential reviewers (comment with their GH usernames but without the @ symbol to avoid tagging them just yet)? |
Dear @AdamRJensen, thank you for considering me for the interesting review. Unfortunately, I would not have capacity to start the review before the beginning of December. I suggest you continue looking for another reviewer. If you did not find anyone till then, you can contact me again. |
@AdamRJensen. We thought about the following additional candidates:
|
👋 @lisazeyen& @datejada, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
@AdamRJensen Thank you for the invitation to review this submission. I have a tight schedule towards the end of the year, but I will make time to review it. When is the due date? |
@datejada we usually aim for six weeks but we'd very much appreciate your review even if it slightly exceeds this. @editorialbot add @datejada as reviewer |
Thanks everyone! @AdamRJensen: the editorial bot didn't reply, is this a bug or normal behavior? |
Dear @AdamRJensen thanks for considering me as a reviewer. Unfortunately, I don't have time to review this time! |
@editorialbot add @datejada as reviewer |
@datejada added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #7402. |
Submitting author: @JeanWi (Jan F. Wiegner)
Repository: https://github.com/UU-ER/AdOpT-NET0
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-submission
Version: v0.1.2
Editor: @AdamRJensen
Reviewers: @trevorb1, @datejada
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @JeanWi. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@JeanWi if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: