-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: Back to sequences: find the origin of k-mers #6872
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for 🔴 Failed to discover a |
License info: 🔴 Failed to discover a valid open source license |
|
Hello @pierrepeterlongo, here are the things you can ask me to do:
|
@editorialbot commands |
Hello @pierrepeterlongo, here are the things you can ask me to do:
|
Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
We may suggest |
@editorialbot list reviewers |
Please log in the JOSS Reviewers site to search through the list of current reviewers. |
@editorialbot check repository |
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: 🟡 License found: |
Suggested reviewers: |
@editorialbot generate pdf |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: Metagenomic classification with KrakenUniq on low-memory computers Sepia, a taxonomy oriented read classifier in Rust Koverage: Read-coverage analysis for massive (meta)genomics datasets ReferenceSeeker: rapid determination of appropriate reference genomes ROCK: digital normalization of whole genome sequencing data |
@pierrepeterlongo thanks for making those updates/changes to have your paper conform more to our standards. As AEiC for this track I am currently pre-reviewing your submission and am also looking for a handling editor. Since all editors in this domain are pre-occupied with other submissions it may take a longer than usual to find/assign an editor. Hence I've just added the For the moment could you work on the below points:
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
Thanks @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman for your feedbacks.
The last entries with no DOI are citations of github repositories. Maybe this is not the right way to do?
We have added a contributing.md file indicating contributing guidelines.
The documentation is now in a separate readthedocs repository: https://b2s-doc.readthedocs.io/en Thanks, |
Hello there, Links to automated testing are now ready and linked in the readme. Pierre |
@editorialbot invite @majensen as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@pierrepeterlongo I've invited an editor who I hope can handle this submission. I have looked at the automated testing link. Are you referring to the testing badge? That link does not seem to work. Could you also link to the contributing.md file from the readme? |
@editorialbot assign me as editor |
Assigned! @majensen is now the editor |
Checking with another potential reviewer offline. |
Thanks so much @Anjan-Purkayastha for agreeing to review this work. I will add you to the reviewers now; the review will start after I find one more reviewer and open the official review issue. |
@editorialbot add @Anjan-Purkayastha as reviewer |
@Anjan-Purkayastha added to the reviewers list! |
Hi @majensen, I can review this one. |
@amoeba very much appreciated |
@editorialbot add @amoeba as reviewer |
@amoeba added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #7066. |
Submitting author: @pierrepeterlongo (Pierre Peterlongo)
Repository: https://github.com/pierrepeterlongo/back_to_sequences/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.6.5
Editor: @majensen
Reviewers: @Anjan-Purkayastha, @amoeba
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @pierrepeterlongo. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@pierrepeterlongo if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: