Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: Project RACCOON: Automated construction of PDB files for polymers and polymer peptide conjugates #6219

Closed
editorialbot opened this issue Jan 12, 2024 · 28 comments
Assignees
Labels
Jupyter Notebook pre-review Python TeX Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

editorialbot commented Jan 12, 2024

Submitting author: @moritzobenauer (Moritz Obenauer)
Repository: https://github.com/moritzobenauer/ProjectRaccoon
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.1
Editor: @jromanowska
Reviewers: @taoliu032, @lorenzo-rovigatti
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a72d0ea4ef2c43b6384a5fff784aa1ba"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a72d0ea4ef2c43b6384a5fff784aa1ba/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a72d0ea4ef2c43b6384a5fff784aa1ba/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a72d0ea4ef2c43b6384a5fff784aa1ba)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @moritzobenauer. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@moritzobenauer if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials labels Jan 12, 2024
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (682.3 files/s, 95886.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON                             1              0              0           1683
Python                          21            468            325           1465
YAML                             5             22             12            147
Markdown                         4             52              0            126
TeX                              1              9              0            116
Bourne Shell                     1             11              7             41
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0            267             27
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            34            562            611           3605
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 805

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41467-021-27627-4 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00054 is OK
- 10.1080/08927022.2010.507247 is OK
- 10.1002/marc.201800459 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092319-083243 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1186/1758-2946-4-17 may be a valid DOI for title: Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20945 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.54677/MNMH8546 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

E2EDNA 2.0: Python Pipeline for Simulating DNA Aptamers with Ligands
Submitting author: @taoliu032
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @JoaoRodrigues, @rvhonorato
Similarity score: 0.8082

oxDNA: coarse-grained simulations of nucleic acids made simple
Submitting author: @lorenzo-rovigatti
Handling editor: @ppxasjsm (Active)
Reviewers: @ptmerz, @degiacom
Similarity score: 0.8068

Cocktail Shaker: An open source drug expansion and enumeration library for peptides
Submitting author: @Sulstice
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @olivertomic, @richardjgowers
Similarity score: 0.8052

polypy - Analysis Tools for Solid State Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo Trajectories
Submitting author: @symmy596
Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active)
Reviewers: @hmacdope, @lscalfi
Similarity score: 0.7999

ELECTRIC: Electric fields Leveraged from multipole Expansion Calculations in Tinker Rapid Interface Code
Submitting author: @valeriewelborn
Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active)
Reviewers: @amandadumi, @govarguz
Similarity score: 0.7976

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@moritzobenauer
Copy link

moritzobenauer commented Jan 12, 2024

Hello everybody,

in the following is a list of potential reviewers I find suitable for the project:
Xujian Wang
Benjamin Riesrichardjgowers
Yuxuan Zhuang
Matt Thompson

(Invalid DOIs pointed out by the editorialbot have been fixed 01/12/23)

If I can be of any further help, please let me know. Looking forward to the reviewing process. Best, Moritz

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman added the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Jan 16, 2024
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@moritzobenauer thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help with initial steps. I have just flagged this work for a scope review. This is because I need some help from the domain specialists in the editorial board to judge if this submission is in scope for JOSS. This scope review should take about two weeks.

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman added query-scope Submissions of uncertain scope for JOSS and removed waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. query-scope Submissions of uncertain scope for JOSS labels Jan 17, 2024
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@moritzobenauer I am happy to inform you that the editorial board has determined that this submission may be in scope for JOSS. I have removed the query-scope label and will now be looking to assign a handling editor.

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot invite @jromanowska as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

👋 @jromanowska would you be able to edit this one? Thanks!

@jromanowska
Copy link

@editorialbot assign me as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assigned! @jromanowska is now the editor

@jromanowska
Copy link

Hi, @moritzobenauer , I will be serving as an editor on your submission. I'll try to find suitable reviewers asap. In the meantime, let me know if any changes occur.

@jromanowska
Copy link

@editorialbot check references

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41467-021-27627-4 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00054 is OK
- 10.1080/08927022.2010.507247 is OK
- 10.1002/marc.201800459 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092319-083243 is OK
- 10.1002/jcc.20945 is OK
- 10.54677/MNMH8546 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1186/1758-2946-4-17 may be a valid DOI for title: Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform

INVALID DOIs

- None

@jromanowska
Copy link

@moritzobenauer - could you add a correct DOI to the reference, as shown above?

@moritzobenauer
Copy link

Hey, @jromanowska, the missing DOI was added. Sorry for the oversight!

@jromanowska
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

E2EDNA 2.0: Python Pipeline for Simulating DNA Aptamers with Ligands
Submitting author: @taoliu032
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @JoaoRodrigues, @rvhonorato
Similarity score: 0.8130

oxDNA: coarse-grained simulations of nucleic acids made simple
Submitting author: @lorenzo-rovigatti
Handling editor: @ppxasjsm (Active)
Reviewers: @ptmerz, @degiacom
Similarity score: 0.8127

Cocktail Shaker: An open source drug expansion and enumeration library for peptides
Submitting author: @Sulstice
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @olivertomic, @richardjgowers
Similarity score: 0.8119

polypy - Analysis Tools for Solid State Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo Trajectories
Submitting author: @symmy596
Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active)
Reviewers: @hmacdope, @lscalfi
Similarity score: 0.8079

ELECTRIC: Electric fields Leveraged from multipole Expansion Calculations in Tinker Rapid Interface Code
Submitting author: @valeriewelborn
Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active)
Reviewers: @amandadumi, @govarguz
Similarity score: 0.8050

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@jromanowska
Copy link

@editorialbot add @taoliu032 as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@taoliu032 added to the reviewers list!

@jromanowska
Copy link

@editorialbot add @lorenzo-rovigatti as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@lorenzo-rovigatti added to the reviewers list!

@jromanowska
Copy link

@editorialbot start review

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK, I've started the review over in #6293.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Jupyter Notebook pre-review Python TeX Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants