[PRE REVIEW]: pysolorie: a Python package for optimal orientation analysis of solar panels

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @aaghamohammadi (Alireza Aghamohammadi)
Repository: https://github.com/aaghamohammadi/pysolorie
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.5.6
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/72c8bf704a96f2dc1771eb0e24ddb279"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/72c8bf704a96f2dc1771eb0e24ddb279/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/72c8bf704a96f2dc1771eb0e24ddb279/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/72c8bf704a96f2dc1771eb0e24ddb279)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @aaghamohammadi. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@aaghamohammadi if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (1107.2 files/s, 128258.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              2              1             19           2007
Python                          21            411            723           1059
reStructuredText                14            277            223            391
Markdown                         5             68              0            180
TeX                              1             14              0            159
YAML                             4             44              0            154
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
TOML                             1              1              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            50            828            973           3991
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 838

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41598-023-39892-y is OK
- 10.1016/0038-092x(76)90045-1 is OK
- 10.1063/5.0161277 is OK
- 10.1002/9781119540328 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.032 is OK
- 10.1155/2013/307547 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.131 is OK
- 10.1201/b18119 is OK
- 10.2172/1660126 is OK
- 10.2172/1089596 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00884 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

SunPy: A Python package for Solar Physics
Submitting author: @Cadair
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @mwcraig, @ceb8
Similarity score: 0.8325

bifacial_radiance: a python package for modeling bifacial solar photovoltaic systems
Submitting author: @shirubana
Handling editor: @melissawm (Retired)
Reviewers: @wholmgren, @dalonsoa, @usethedata
Similarity score: 0.8314

BifacialSimu: Holistic Simulation of large-scale Bifacial Photovoltaic Systems
Submitting author: @EwaGomez
Handling editor: @rkurchin (Active)
Reviewers: @sidihamady, @kanderso-nrel
Similarity score: 0.8296

PyAstroPol: A Python package for the instrumental polarization analysis of the astronomical optics.
Submitting author: @hemanthpruthvi
Handling editor: @pibion (Retired)
Reviewers: @aquilesC, @caldarolamartin, @mwcraig
Similarity score: 0.8289

aiapy: A Python Package for Analyzing Solar EUV Image Data from AIA
Submitting author: @wtbarnes
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @hayesla, @samaloney
Similarity score: 0.8088

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[kyleniemeyer]

Hello @aaghamohammadi, thanks for your submission to JOSS. We'll use this pre-review issue to assign an editor and find reviewers; unfortunately, we don't have any editors available to handle your submission right now, so I need to put this on our waitlist until someone can edit it.

In the meantime, any reviewer recommendations you can make would be welcome.

[aaghamohammadi]

Thank you for updating me on the status of the paper.

Our package references pvlib, which is closely related to our package. Given this connection, I would like to recommend the following individuals who have reviewed that package:

Editor: rkurchin
Reviewers: EwaGomez, phoebe-p

This recommendation is based on their familiarity with the subject matter, which I believe will be beneficial for the review process. Thank you for considering my suggestions.

[aaghamohammadi]

Dear @kyleniemeyer

I am writing to inquire about the status of our paper, which I submitted approximately four months ago.

Could you kindly provide an update and inform me if an editor would be assigned soon?

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot invite @AdamRJensen as editor

Hi @AdamRJensen, can you edit this submission?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[kyleniemeyer]

@aaghamohammadi unfortunately, upon further review, the JOSS editorial board has found that your submission does not meet our requirements for substantial scholarly effort. I'm sorry that it took so long to return this decision to you, that is very much my fault.

We encourage you to use other mechanisms to archive your software such that it might be cited, including following GitHub's guide on how to create a permanent archive and DOI for your software.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot reject

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.