[PRE REVIEW]: cortecs: A Python package for compressing opacities

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @arjunsavel (Arjun B. Savel)
Repository: https://github.com/arjunsavel/cortecs
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.2.0-beta
Editor: @ivastar
Reviewers: @pscicluna, @doriannblain
Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b0c4f5012351abb476081ffe9226fbf4"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b0c4f5012351abb476081ffe9226fbf4/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b0c4f5012351abb476081ffe9226fbf4/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b0c4f5012351abb476081ffe9226fbf4)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @arjunsavel. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@arjunsavel if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.07 s (687.1 files/s, 76710.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          24            507            888           1361
TeX                              1              8              0            221
Markdown                         3             60              0            200
YAML                             9             40             58            198
Jupyter Notebook                 4              0           1295            188
reStructuredText                 6             57             76             90
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            47            672           2317           2258
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 826

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.00024 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1038/s41586-021-03912-6 may be a valid DOI for title: A solar C/O and sub-solar metallicity in a hot Jupiter atmosphere
- 10.3847/1538-3881/ac658f may be a valid DOI for title: Confirmation of water absorption in the thermal emission spectrum of the hot Jupiter WASP-77Ab with HST/WFC3
- 10.3847/2041-8213/ace828 may be a valid DOI for title: Confirmation of sub-solar metallicity for WASP-77Ab from JWST thermal emission spectroscopy
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201322971 may be a valid DOI for title: X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue
- 10.1088/0004-637x/775/2/137 may be a valid DOI for title: A systematic retrieval analysis of secondary eclipse spectra. I. A comparison of atmospheric retrieval techniques
- 10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8 may be a valid DOI for title: Review of deep learning: Concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac61d6 may be a valid DOI for title: 3D radiative transfer for exoplanet atmospheres. gCMCRT: a GPU-accelerated MCRT code
- 10.1109/bigdata.2017.8257926 may be a valid DOI for title: ooc_cuDNN: Accommodating convolutional neural networks over GPU memory capacity
- 10.1117/12.2561564 may be a valid DOI for title: On-sky commissioning of MAROON-X: a new precision radial velocity spectrograph for Gemini North
- 10.1088/0004-637x/707/1/24 may be a valid DOI for title: A temperature and abundance retrieval method for exoplanet atmospheres
- 10.3847/1538-3881/acd24d may be a valid DOI for title: Magnetic Effects and 3D Structure in Theoretical High-resolution Transmission Spectra of Ultrahot Jupiters: the Case of WASP-76b
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac423f may be a valid DOI for title: No umbrella needed: confronting the hypothesis of iron rain on WASP-76b with post-processed general circulation models
- 10.3847/1538-3881/accd65 may be a valid DOI for title: Retrieval Survey of Metals in Six Ultrahot Jupiters: Trends in Chemistry, Rain-out, Ionization, and Atmospheric Dynamics
- 10.1093/mnras/stac3388 may be a valid DOI for title: High-resolution atmospheric retrievals of WASP-121b transmission spectroscopy with ESPRESSO: Consistent relative abundance constraints across multiple epochs and instruments
- 10.1093/mnras/sty1877 may be a valid DOI for title: ExoMol molecular line lists XXX: a complete high-accuracy line list for water
- 10.1093/mnras/stt2011 may be a valid DOI for title: ExoMol line lists–III. An improved hot rotation-vibration line list for HCN and HNC
- 10.1093/mnras/stz2778 may be a valid DOI for title: ExoMol molecular line lists–XXXV. A rotation-vibration line list for hot ammonia

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[dfm]

@arjunsavel — Thanks for your submission! I'm working to assign an editor, but in the meantime could you check those DOI suggestions above ☝️

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

SALSA: A Python Package for Constructing Synthetic Quasar Absorption Line Catalogs from Astrophysical Hydrodynamic Simulations
Submitting author: @biboyd
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @olebole, @zpace
Similarity score: 0.8290

coronagraph: Telescope Noise Modeling for Exoplanets in Python
Submitting author: @jlustigy
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @lpueyo
Similarity score: 0.8265

spectrapepper: A Python toolbox for advanced analysis of spectroscopic data for materials and devices.
Submitting author: @enricgrau
Handling editor: @rkurchin (Active)
Reviewers: @stuartcampbell, @ksunden
Similarity score: 0.8218

The Dusty Evolved Star Kit (DESK): A Python package for fitting the Spectral Energy Distribution of Evolved Stars
Submitting author: @s-goldman
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @Deech08, @TomGoffrey
Similarity score: 0.8157

ExoTETHyS: Tools for Exoplanetary Transits around host stars
Submitting author: @gmorello
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @steven-murray, @williamjameshandley
Similarity score: 0.8149

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[arjunsavel]

@dfm done — thank you!

[ivastar]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @ivastar, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor

# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a 
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository

# Set a value for the archive DOI
@editorialbot set set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive

# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

# Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks
@editorialbot create post-review checklist

# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review

[ivastar]

@editorialbot assign @ivastar as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @ivastar is now the editor

[ivastar]

Hi @arjunsavel ! I am taking over as an editor. I will be looking for reviewers in the next week(s). If you have suggestions for suitable editors, please let me know here or via e-mail ([email protected]), that would speed up the process. Let me know if you have questions.

[ivastar]

@editorialbot add @pscicluna as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@pscicluna added to the reviewers list!

[ivastar]

@editorialbot add @doriannblain as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@doriannblain added to the reviewers list!

[ivastar]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6104.