[PRE REVIEW]: MathMat: A Mathematically Aware Matrix Library

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @furmada (Adam Furman)
Repository: https://github.com/furmada/MathMat
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bdc11794e63cfe04fa9762437666c3a9"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bdc11794e63cfe04fa9762437666c3a9/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bdc11794e63cfe04fa9762437666c3a9/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bdc11794e63cfe04fa9762437666c3a9)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @furmada. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@furmada if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.09 s (288.2 files/s, 217562.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              5              0            123           7729
HTML                             7           1039              0           7430
Python                           6            237            375            979
TeX                              2             99              0            574
Markdown                         2             43              0            153
JavaScript                       1              3              3             40
TOML                             1              1              0             23
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            25           1423            505          16946
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 950

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

The SuiteSparse Matrix Collection Website Interface
Submitting author: @ScottKolo
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @dblarremore, @tkonolige
Similarity score: 0.8180

PYroMat: A Python package for thermodynamic properties
Submitting author: @jranalli
Handling editor: @jgostick (Active)
Reviewers: @espottesmith, @fwitte
Similarity score: 0.8142

mpnum: A matrix product representation library for Python
Submitting author: @dseuss
Handling editor: @labarba (Retired)
Reviewers: @SylvainCorlay
Similarity score: 0.8072

Armadillo: a template-based C++ library for linear algebra
Submitting author: @conradsnicta
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @wrathematics
Similarity score: 0.8062

MatD^3^: A Database and Online Presentation Package for Research Data Supporting Materials Discovery, Design, and Dissemination
Submitting author: @raullaasner
Handling editor: @majensen (Active)
Reviewers: @dgasmith, @mkhorton
Similarity score: 0.8007

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[danielskatz]

👋 @furmada - thanks for your submission.

Note that your paper doesn't have a "References" header. Please follow the example paper. In addition, please remove the references you aren't using in the .bib file. Please feel free to make changes to your .bib file, then use the command @editorialbot check references to check the DOI, and the command @editorialbot generate pdf after making changes to the .md file or when the references are right to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.

In addition, due to the relatively small amount of code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. You should hear back in a week or so.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot query scope

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[furmada]

@editorialbot check references

[furmada]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

The SuiteSparse Matrix Collection Website Interface
Submitting author: @ScottKolo
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @dblarremore, @tkonolige
Similarity score: 0.8187

MatDL: A Lightweight Deep Learning Library in MATLAB
Submitting author: @haythamfayek
Handling editor: @cMadan (Active)
Reviewers: @nirum
Similarity score: 0.8167

mpnum: A matrix product representation library for Python
Submitting author: @dseuss
Handling editor: @labarba (Retired)
Reviewers: @SylvainCorlay
Similarity score: 0.8104

Armadillo: a template-based C++ library for linear algebra
Submitting author: @conradsnicta
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @wrathematics
Similarity score: 0.8054

PyArmadillo: a streamlined linear algebra library for Python
Submitting author: @jason-rumengan
Handling editor: @mjsottile (Retired)
Reviewers: @JaroslavHron, @uellue
Similarity score: 0.8044

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[danielskatz]

👋 @furmada - I'm sorry to say that after discussion amongst the JOSS editors, we have decided that this submission does not meet the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS.

Comments from editors discussed the relatively simplicity of the software and the fact that some of it is wrapping of existing software. Some editors were unsure how it improves upon numpy/scipy for general usage. The lack of tests was also an issue.

Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#other-venues-for-reviewing-and-publishing-software-packages for other suggestions for how you might receive credit for your work.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot reject

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.